Trump Admin Lawyer: Biden ‘100%’ Broke Laws When He Withheld Funds That Were For The Border Wall Construction

OPINION | This article contains opinion. This site is licensed to publish this content.

Mark Paoletta claims that Biden violated federal laws when removing funds for the construction of the border wall, according to The Western Jounral.

“Do you believe that the executive branch violated GAO’s standard of the Impoundment Control Act when it began withholding funds for the border wall?” Paoletta was asked.

“100 percent,” Paoletta stated.

The Biden order states, “Like every nation, the United States has a right and a duty to secure its borders and protect its people against threats.”

“But building a massive wall that spans the entire southern border is not a serious policy solution.”

“It is a waste of money that diverts attention from genuine threats to our homeland security.”

From The Western Journal:

During a hearing of the House Budget Committee, Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri asked Paoletta whether the president’s controversial decision violated a 1974 law that limits a president’s power to withhold funds.

The White House issued a proclamation on Jan. 20 halting funding for building a barricade at the southern border, which was one of the top priorities of former President Donald Trump.

Republican lawmakers asked the Government Accountability Office for a review to determine whether the administration violated laws that allow Congress to have control over where federal funds go, Politico reported last month.

The report said the GAO confirmed that it was investigating the matter.

The GOP lawmakers attributed Biden’s reversal of Trump policies, including the order halting border wall funding, to the ongoing crisis at the southern border.

— Advertisement —

The new administration wanted to show off immediately that it was somehow superior in its approach to border policy compared with the previous White House — but that is far from the truth.

Biden has made little to no effort to secure the border in a way that is more humane, and instead prompted a significant influx of migrants to arrive in the United States without any plans to bring it to an end.

The surge of migrants, particularly of unaccompanied minors, created a processing disaster that received bipartisan attention.

A physical wall is not a foolproof solution but serves as an effective deterrent if there is the use of technology and officers are nearby for additional support.