OPINION | This article contains opinion. This site is licensed to publish this content.
The Supreme Court agreed to decide the fate of a legal dispute involving President Trump’s financial records.
The court’s ruling will determine whether President Trump can be protected against congressional and state subpoenas for his personal banking and accounting records.
“At issue is the extent a sitting president can be subject to congressional oversight — under “valid legislative purposes” — of his private business dealings before he took office,” Fox News reported.
“The high court will also look at the extent a sitting president can be subject to state and local grand jury investigations and prosecutions,” Fox News added.
Jay Sekulow, counsel to the president, said in a statement:
“We are pleased that the Supreme Court granted review of the President’s three pending cases…
“These cases raise significant constitutional issues. We look forward to presenting our written and oral arguments.”
Democratic chairmen of several House Committees involved in investigating Trump said in a joint statement:
“While we are disappointed that Congress will now have to wait several more months to get a final ruling, we look forward to presenting our case to the Supreme Court, and we are hopeful that the Court will agree with these well-reasoned decisions.”
More from Fox News:
One case involves requests for documents sought by the House Oversight and Reform Committee after the president’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, testified that Trump underreported or overstated the extent of his financial holdings to the government. Cohen is serving a three-year federal prison sentence for lying to Congress and financial-related offenses.
A second subpoena involves House Financial Services Committee and House Intelligence Committee requests for 10 years of records from various banks that did business with Trump, his adult children, and his businesses. The committee is probing lending practices by major financial institutions, and allegations of Russian money laundering.
Meanwhile, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr. has empaneled a state grand jury seeking eight years of tax records relating to allegations of hush-money payments to two women claiming prior sexual affairs with Trump, allegations he has denied.
Lawyers for the House committees had urged the high court to intervene now, saying the Democrat-led panels are actively pursuing the extent of any foreign interference in U.S. politics, which may be key to legislative safeguards ahead of next year’s elections.
